![]() The Spouses Capulong pleaded not guilty in their arraignment. ![]() de Guzman in the aforestated amount of ₱700,000.00 as she was unable to register, much less foreclose, said chattel mortgage with the LTO because the motor number of the mortgaged truck indicated in the chattel mortgage was already different from the number of the new motor installed in said truck. de Guzman from registering said chattel mortgage with the Land Transportation Office that thereafter, herein accused even replaced the motor of subject truck with a different one, to the damage and prejudice of Francisca P. de Guzman to lend back to them the Registration Certificate and the Official Receipt of Payment of registration fees of the above mortgaged truck under the pretext that they would use said documents in applying for additional loan and/or show said documents to somebody interested to buy said truck, but said accused once in possession of said documents, instead of doing so and with intent to cause damage, concealed or destroyed the above-described registration certificate and the official receipt, thereby preventing Francisca P. DE GUZMAN, with grave abuse of confidence, with intent to defraud and in conspiracy with each other, did then and there willfully, unlawfully and feloniously induce, thru false representation, said Francisca P. PLV-227 in the amount of ₱700,000.00 in favor of one FRANCISCA P. Capulong, having previously chattel mortgaged their Isuzu truck with Plate No. That on or about the 10 th day of December, 1990, in Cabanatuan City, Philippines, and within the jurisdiction of this Honorable Court, the above-named accused Spouses Fernando Capulong and Anita M. ![]() In an Information filed on February 28, 1995, petitioner Anita Capulong (Anita) and her husband, Fernando Capulong (Fernando), (Spouses Capulong) were accused of the crime of Estafa, committed as follows: 3(c) of the Revised Penal Code is hereby AFFIRMED with MODIFICATION, in that the Appellant is sentenced to an indeterminate prison term of four (4) years and two (2) months of prision correccional, as minimum, to twenty years (20) of reclusion temporal, as maximum. WHEREFORE, premises considered, the Decision dated Augof the Regional Trial Court (RTC), Third Judicial Region, Branch 86 of Cabanatuan City, convicting Appellant Anita Capulong of the crime of Estafa as defined and penalized under Article 315, par. 28713, the dispositive portion of which states: This petition for review on certiorari under Rule 45 of the Rules of Court (Rules) seeks to annul the NovemDecision 1 and DecemResolution 2 of the Court of Appeals (CA) in CA-G.R.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |